{"id":1542,"date":"2026-10-06T16:08:43","date_gmt":"2026-10-06T16:08:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.kingbaseglobal.com\/blog\/tech-blog\/oracle-database-modernization-tco-and-compatibility\/"},"modified":"2026-10-06T16:08:43","modified_gmt":"2026-10-06T16:08:43","slug":"oracle-database-modernization-tco-and-compatibility","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.kingbaseglobal.com\/blog\/tech-blog\/oracle-database-modernization-tco-and-compatibility\/","title":{"rendered":"Oracle Database Modernization_ TCO and Compatibility"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/kingbase-bbs.oss-cn-beijing.aliyuncs.com\/qywx\/blogImage\/5f60246a-b775-445b-b4b1-71be342448ba.webp\" alt=\"A ledger book sealed with wax and a brass stamp resting on linen, symbolizing verified value proof.\" \/><\/p>\n<h2>Deconstructing Oracle TCO: The Hidden Costs of Lock-in and Maintenance<\/h2>\n<p>To evaluate the feasibility of Oracle database modernization, organizations must first establish a precise baseline for their current Total Cost of Ownership (TCO). TCO extends beyond initial licensing fees to encompass maintenance, infrastructure, and the hidden costs of vendor lock-in. This section provides a framework for evaluating these costs, distinguishing between observed evidence from migration cases and projected value.<\/p>\n<h3>TCO Evaluation Framework<\/h3>\n<p>Specific TCO reduction percentages or cost savings figures are not provided in the available evidence. Instead, organizations must measure their own baseline components to create a comparable cost model for alternative commercial databases, such as KingbaseES.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th style=\"text-align:left\">TCO Component<\/th>\n<th style=\"text-align:left\">Description<\/th>\n<th style=\"text-align:left\">Measurement Requirement<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align:left\"><strong>Licensing Fees<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align:left\">Per-core or per-processor costs, often with complex metric definitions.<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align:left\">Document current Oracle licenses and compare against KingbaseES commercial licensing models.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align:left\"><strong>Maintenance &amp; Support<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align:left\">Annual fees for patches and updates.<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align:left\">Calculate current Oracle support costs and compare against KingbaseES support agreements.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align:left\"><strong>Infrastructure<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align:left\">Hardware, storage, and networking required for high availability.<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align:left\">Inventory hardware costs dedicated to Oracle workloads and assess consolidation opportunities.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align:left\"><strong>Operational Complexity<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align:left\">Specialized skills required for PL\/SQL and Oracle-specific tuning.<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align:left\">Estimate labor costs for DBA support and application maintenance in the new environment.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align:left\"><strong>Vendor Lock-in Risk<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align:left\">Cost and effort associated with switching away from Oracle.<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align:left\">Quantify the effort to refactor proprietary code and retrain staff based on compatibility assessments.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3>Observed Evidence vs. Projected Value<\/h3>\n<p>It is critical to separate observed evidence from projected value in modernization projects.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Observed Evidence:<\/strong> Migration cases, such as the migration from MySQL to KingbaseES at FAW Group (China First Automobile Group) and a government project migrating from MySQL 5.7, demonstrate the effectiveness of migration tools and the importance of data accuracy. These cases provide evidence that structured migration processes can ensure data integrity.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Projected Value:<\/strong> Potential TCO reduction is a projected outcome dependent on the specific baseline costs of the legacy Oracle environment and the efficiency of the new KingbaseES deployment. Without specific baseline data, these remain projections rather than guaranteed savings.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Quantifying Vendor Lock-in<\/h3>\n<p>Vendor lock-in is not just a technical constraint but a financial risk. It manifests in the cost of refactoring proprietary code, retraining staff, and potential downtime during migration. To mitigate this, enterprises should assess the depth of Oracle-specific dependencies in their applications. High dependency on Oracle-specific features (e.g., specific PL\/SQL packages, Oracle RAC configurations) increases the cost and complexity of switching to any commercial alternative.<\/p>\n<h3>Establishing the Baseline<\/h3>\n<p>Before comparing alternatives, organizations must document their current TCO. This includes:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Licensing Audit:<\/strong> Reviewing current Oracle licenses, including user\/device licenses and core counts.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Support Costs:<\/strong> Calculating annual maintenance fees.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Infrastructure Inventory:<\/strong> Documenting hardware and storage costs dedicated to Oracle workloads.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Operational Costs:<\/strong> Estimating labor costs for DBA support and application maintenance.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>This baseline serves as the reference point for evaluating the potential benefits of migration. Without this data, any claim of cost savings remains speculative.<\/p>\n<h2>The Compatibility Reality: Measuring PL\/SQL and SQL Migration Effort<\/h2>\n<p>A primary concern in Oracle database modernization is the compatibility of existing code, particularly complex SQL and PL\/SQL logic. Assuming 100% compatibility is a common pitfall that leads to unexpected refactoring efforts and project delays.<\/p>\n<h3>Assessing PL\/SQL Compatibility<\/h3>\n<p>PL\/SQL is Oracle\u2019s proprietary procedural extension to SQL. Migrating applications that rely heavily on PL\/SQL requires a structured assessment to identify incompatibilities.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Static Code Analysis:<\/strong> Use assessment tools to scan source code for Oracle-specific syntax, functions, and packages.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Dependency Mapping:<\/strong> Identify all database objects (tables, views, procedures) and their interdependencies.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Complexity Scoring:<\/strong> Categorize code by complexity (simple, moderate, complex) to estimate refactoring effort.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h3>KingbaseES Migration Assessment (KDMS)<\/h3>\n<p>For enterprises evaluating commercial alternatives, tools like KingbaseES\u2019s Migration Assessment System (KDMS) provide a structured approach to this evaluation. As noted in Kingbase Training Materials, KingbaseES provides heterogeneous database and application SQL migration assessment system KDMS and one-click migration tool KDTS.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Assessment Scope:<\/strong> KDMS can evaluate SQL and PL\/SQL compatibility, identifying unsupported features and suggesting alternatives.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Effort Estimation:<\/strong> The tool provides estimates for migration effort, helping teams plan resources and timelines accurately.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Risk Identification:<\/strong> It highlights potential risks, such as data type mismatches or logic errors, before migration begins.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Using such assessment tools allows organizations to move from assumption-based planning to evidence-based planning. This reduces the risk of unexpected refactoring and ensures that the modernization project remains within budget and timeline constraints.<\/p>\n<h2>Architecting for High-Availability Migration: Dual-Track Synchronization and Rollback<\/h2>\n<p>Minimizing downtime during migration is a critical requirement for enterprise systems. Traditional &quot;big bang&quot; migrations often involve significant downtime, which is unacceptable for critical business operations.<\/p>\n<h3>Dual-Track Parallel Running Strategy<\/h3>\n<p>A robust strategy for minimizing downtime is dual-track parallel running. This approach involves running the legacy Oracle system and the new commercial database system simultaneously during the transition period.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Data Synchronization:<\/strong> Use heterogeneous data synchronization tools to keep data in sync between the old and new systems.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Traffic Routing:<\/strong> Gradually shift user traffic from the legacy system to the new system.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Validation:<\/strong> Continuously validate data consistency and application performance in the new environment.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>KingbaseES Heterogeneous Data Synchronization<\/h3>\n<p>KingbaseES offers heterogeneous data synchronization software that supports dual-track parallel running. According to Kingbase Training Materials, this solution allows for parallel running of the original environment and the new environment, with the ability to roll back at any time.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Parallel Execution:<\/strong> The system can run both the original Oracle environment and the new KingbaseES environment in parallel.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Rollback Capability:<\/strong> If issues arise during the cutover, the system can be rolled back to the original environment at any time, ensuring business continuity.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Data Consistency:<\/strong> The synchronization tool ensures that data remains consistent between the two systems throughout the transition.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This architectural pattern significantly reduces the risk associated with database migration. It allows organizations to test the new system in a production-like environment before fully committing, providing a safety net that &quot;big bang&quot; migrations lack. Note that this is a strategy enabled by KingbaseES tools and requires proper implementation to be effective.<\/p>\n<h2>Validating Integrity and Performance: HA Testing and Session Analysis<\/h2>\n<p>Ensuring that the new database environment maintains high availability (HA) and data integrity is essential for enterprise success. Migration is not complete until the new system is validated against operational requirements.<\/p>\n<h3>High Availability Testing<\/h3>\n<p>KingbaseES provides a high availability testing solution designed to verify system availability across different deployment architectures. As described in KING\u5927\u5496\u76f4\u64ad (2024-11-26), this solution helps users quickly complete use case verification under different scenario architectures to achieve fault-free perception.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Scenario Verification:<\/strong> The solution supports use case verification under various scenario architectures (e.g., primary-standby, cluster).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Fault Tolerance:<\/strong> It helps verify that the system can achieve fault-free perception, ensuring minimal disruption during failures.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Performance Impact:<\/strong> Testing includes assessing the performance impact of HA configurations on transactional workloads.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Kingbase Session History (KSH) for Performance Tuning<\/h3>\n<p>Once the system is live, ongoing performance tuning is necessary. KingbaseES V9 introduced the Kingbase Session History (KSH) component for detailed session history analysis. According to Kingbase Training Materials, KSH and corresponding report tools were introduced in V9.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Session Analysis:<\/strong> KSH captures detailed information about database sessions, including SQL execution, wait events, and resource usage.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Performance Bottlenecks:<\/strong> It helps DBAs identify performance bottlenecks and optimize SQL queries.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Reporting:<\/strong> KSH provides corresponding report tools to visualize performance trends and diagnose issues.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Installation Integrity Verification<\/h3>\n<p>Before deployment, ensuring the integrity of the database software is critical. KingbaseES installation packages (.iso) and license files (license.dat) are distributed via the official Kingbase website. As per Kingbase Documentation, download integrity is verified using MD5 and SHA1 checksums.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Checksum Verification:<\/strong> Use MD5 and SHA1 checksums to verify the integrity of downloaded files against those obtained from the Kingbase official website.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Control File:<\/strong> The database control file stores static initialization information and dynamic configuration from <code>kingbase.conf<\/code>. Corruption of this file results in database crash and failure to start, requiring recovery procedures.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>These validation steps ensure that the new environment is stable, secure, and performant from day one.<\/p>\n<h2>Security and Compliance: Navigating National Cryptographic Standards and Local Regulations<\/h2>\n<p>Security and compliance are non-negotiable aspects of enterprise database modernization. Enterprises must ensure that their new database environment meets regulatory and security standards relevant to their operating regions.<\/p>\n<h3>National Cryptographic (Guomi) Identity Authentication<\/h3>\n<p>KingbaseES supports national cryptographic (Guomi) identity authentication mechanisms. As noted in KING\u5927\u5496\u76f4\u64ad (2024-10-15), KingbaseES strictly follows international and domestic security standards and supports national cryptographic identity authentication.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Compliance:<\/strong> Supports adherence to specific domestic security standards.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Authentication:<\/strong> Provides secure identity authentication using national cryptographic algorithms.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Data Protection:<\/strong> Enhances data security by ensuring that access controls are enforced using strong cryptographic methods.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Malaysian Context: PDPA and Local Support<\/h3>\n<p>For enterprises operating in Malaysia, compliance with Malaysia&#8217;s Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) is critical. It is important to note that Malaysia&#8217;s PDPA does not create a blanket data-residency mandate requiring all data to reside locally, but organizations must still ensure data handling practices comply with the act.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Local Support:<\/strong> There is no evidence of KingbaseES having local offices, engineers, or data centers in Malaysia. Enterprises should verify local partner availability for support and implementation.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Certifications:<\/strong> There is no evidence of specific Malaysian customer certifications or compliance audits for KingbaseES. Organizations should conduct their own due diligence.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Configuration:<\/strong> While KingbaseES supports Guomi standards, additional configuration may be required to meet international or local compliance requirements such as GDPR or PDPA.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Security Audit and Best Practices<\/h3>\n<p>Beyond specific features, enterprises should conduct security audits to verify that their new database environment meets their security policies. This includes:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Access Control:<\/strong> Implementing role-based access control (RBAC) and least privilege principles.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Encryption:<\/strong> Enabling data-at-rest and data-in-transit encryption.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Auditing:<\/strong> Enabling comprehensive audit logs to track database activity.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>While KingbaseES provides these capabilities, the responsibility for configuring and maintaining a secure environment lies with the enterprise. Regular security reviews and updates are essential to maintain compliance.<\/p>\n<h2>Limitations<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Geographic Scope:<\/strong> KingbaseES is optimized for Chinese domestic standards (Guomi). International compliance (e.g., GDPR, PDPA) may require additional configuration and validation.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Local Presence:<\/strong> There is no evidence of KingbaseES local support, certifications, or customer presence in Malaysia. Users must verify partner availability.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Performance Claims:<\/strong> No specific benchmark data showing transactional consistency and HA performance metrics are provided. Performance claims are not guaranteed and depend on specific workload configurations.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Cost Savings:<\/strong> No specific ROI, cost savings, or performance improvement figures are provided. TCO reduction is a projected value dependent on individual baseline data.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Decision Gate: The Modernization Readiness Framework<\/h2>\n<p>Before committing to an Oracle database modernization project, organizations should use the following decision gate framework to assess their readiness. This checklist ensures that all critical aspects\u2014TCO, compatibility, downtime, and security\u2014have been evaluated based on evidence.<\/p>\n<h3>Readiness Checklist<\/h3>\n<ol>\n<li>\n<p><strong>TCO Baseline Established:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"task-list-item\">Current Oracle TCO components (licensing, support, infrastructure) are documented.<\/li>\n<li class=\"task-list-item\">A comparable cost model for the alternative commercial database is developed.<\/li>\n<li class=\"task-list-item\">Vendor lock-in risks are quantified and factored into the business case.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><strong>Compatibility Assessment Completed:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"task-list-item\">PL\/SQL and SQL compatibility has been assessed using tools like KDMS.<\/li>\n<li class=\"task-list-item\">Refactoring effort has been estimated and budgeted.<\/li>\n<li class=\"task-list-item\">Critical business logic has been validated for compatibility.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><strong>Downtime Mitigation Strategy Defined:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"task-list-item\">A dual-track parallel running strategy is in place.<\/li>\n<li class=\"task-list-item\">Heterogeneous data synchronization tools are selected and tested.<\/li>\n<li class=\"task-list-item\">Rollback procedures are documented and tested.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><strong>HA and Performance Validated:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"task-list-item\">High availability testing has been conducted using tools like KingbaseES HA testing solution.<\/li>\n<li class=\"task-list-item\">Performance baselines are established and compared against Oracle.<\/li>\n<li class=\"task-list-item\">Kingbase Session History (KSH) is configured for ongoing tuning.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><strong>Security and Compliance Verified:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"task-list-item\">Security requirements (e.g., Guomi authentication) are mapped to database capabilities.<\/li>\n<li class=\"task-list-item\">Access control and encryption policies are configured.<\/li>\n<li class=\"task-list-item\">Audit logs are enabled and reviewed.<\/li>\n<li class=\"task-list-item\">Local regulatory requirements (e.g., Malaysia PDPA) are addressed.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h3>Final Considerations<\/h3>\n<p>KingbaseES is a commercial database software developed by China Electronics Technology Kingbase (Beijing) Technologies Inc. It is not open-source or community-supported. Enterprises should verify all claims against the official KingbaseES documentation and evidence packages.<\/p>\n<p>The decision to migrate should be based on a thorough evaluation of the specific workload, compatibility results, and TCO analysis. There is no one-size-fits-all solution. Each enterprise must validate its readiness using the framework above and conduct proof-of-concept (PoC) tests to confirm compatibility and performance.<\/p>\n<h2>FAQ<\/h2>\n<h3>How do I calculate the true TCO of migrating from Oracle to a commercial alternative?<\/h3>\n<p>Calculate the true TCO by documenting all current Oracle costs (licensing, support, infrastructure, labor) and comparing them to the projected costs of the alternative, including migration expenses, refactoring costs, and new licensing fees. Use a baseline assessment to ensure accurate comparison.<\/p>\n<h3>What are the measurable risks of PL\/SQL migration without code refactoring?<\/h3>\n<p>Risks include syntax errors, unsupported function failures, and performance degradation. Measure these risks by using assessment tools like KDMS to identify incompatibilities and estimate the effort required for refactoring.<\/p>\n<h3>How can I benchmark performance improvements objectively before committing?<\/h3>\n<p>Establish performance baselines in the current Oracle environment using standard workloads. Then, run the same workloads in the new environment using tools like Kingbase Session History (KSH) to compare metrics such as query execution time, throughput, and resource usage.<\/p>\n<h3>What architectural patterns minimize downtime during database cutover?<\/h3>\n<p>Dual-track parallel running with heterogeneous data synchronization is a proven pattern. It allows for gradual traffic migration and provides a rollback mechanism to the legacy system if issues arise.<\/p>\n<h3>What evaluation criteria distinguish viable commercial alternatives from Oracle?<\/h3>\n<p>Viable alternatives should offer comparable ACID compliance, high-availability features, and migration tooling (like KDMS and KDTS). They should also provide clear evidence of compatibility and performance through testing and validation.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong>\ud83d\udca1 More Resources<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>If you would like to dive deeper into KingbaseES and its application practices across various industries, we have compiled the following official resources to help you get started quickly and develop and operate with efficiency:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/bbs.kingbase.com.cn\/\">Kingbase Community<\/a>: A one-stop interactive platform for technical exchanges, Q&amp;A, and experience sharing\u2014join forces with fellow DBAs and developers.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.kingbaseglobal.com\/Solution-Oracle.html\">Kingbase Solutions<\/a>: One-stop full-stack database migration and cloud-native solutions, supporting smooth migration of multi-source heterogeneous data, ensuring high availability, real-time integration, and sustained high performance.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.kingbaseglobal.com\/Customers.html\">Kingbase Case Studies<\/a>: Real-world user scenarios and implementation outcomes, showcasing KingbaseES&#8217;s outstanding capabilities in high availability, high performance, and IT adaptation.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/docs.kingbase.com.cn\/en\">Kingbase Documentation<\/a>: Authoritative and comprehensive product manuals and technical guides, covering the entire lifecycle from installation and deployment to development, programming, and operations management.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.kingbaseglobal.com\/Download.html\">Free Download<\/a>: Get the latest installation packages, drivers, tools, and patches, supporting multiple platforms and domestic chip architectures.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.kingbaseglobal.com\/blog\/\">Digital Construction Encyclopedia<\/a>: Covers digital strategy planning, data integration, metrics management, database visualization applications, and more to empower enterprise digital transformation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Open Source Resources:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/github.com\/hgsandy\/Kingbase-docs\">GitHub &#8211; Kingbase-docs<\/a>: Kingbase documentation open-source repository\u2014Stars and contributions are welcome.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/gitee.com\/hgsandy\/kingbase-docs\">Gitee &#8211; Kingbase-docs<\/a>: Domestic mirror repository for Kingbase documentation for faster access.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Welcome to explore the resources above and begin your Kingbase journey!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Deconstructing Oracle TCO: The Hidden Costs of Lock-in and Maintenance To evaluate the feasibility of Oracle database modernization, organizations must first establish a precise baseline for their current Total Cost&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1994,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"meta_description":"","_kingbase_seo_description":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1542","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kingbaseglobal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1542","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kingbaseglobal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kingbaseglobal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kingbaseglobal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1994"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kingbaseglobal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1542"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.kingbaseglobal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1542\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kingbaseglobal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1542"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kingbaseglobal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1542"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kingbaseglobal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1542"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}